OVERSIGHT OVERLORD — In his first remarks as Speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy offered a look at one of the new Republican majority’s priorities, saying “it’s time for us to be a check and provide some balance on Biden’s policies.” Then the House approved the formation today of the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government. Now, the GOP has been handed another political gift to further advance its oversight agenda: documents marked classified were found at the Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement, dating from President Joe Biden’s time as VP, which reportedly included materials on foreign countries. The finding comes on the heels of the FBI’s August raid of Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate to forcibly seize classified documents from the former president’s possession. McCarthy was quick to draw the comparison, saying the new information on Biden’s documents suggests Democrats “overplayed their hand.” Yet there appears to be one important distinction: the FBI searched Mar-a-Lago after Trump reportedly ignored a subpoena for the classified materials, while Special Counsel to the President Richard Sauber says when personal attorneys for Biden found the vice presidential documents on Nov. 2, the counsel’s office notified the National Archives, which subsequently took possession of the materials the next day. Biden said today at a news conference in Mexico he “was surprised to learn that there are any government records that were taken to that office.” Attorney General Merrick Garland has now assigned the U.S. attorney in Chicago, John Lausch, to review the case, and the House Oversight committee has already launched an investigation into the documents. In a letter to the White House counsel today, new Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) said the committee “is concerned that President Biden has compromised (intelligence) sources and methods with his own mishandling of classified documents.” To get a better sense of the House GOP’s investigative priorities in the new Congress — and a look into the new investigations that could spawn from the handling of these classified documents — Nightly spoke with POLITICO’s Kyle Cheney, a reporter who covers Congress and legal affairs. This interview has been edited. How much of a priority will investigating Biden be for the new Republican-led Congress? The new Republican Congress knows that legislating isn’t really going to be possible in a divided Congress with a Democratic president, so the most significant thing they achieved were committee gavels that come with subpoena power. They just watched the Jan. 6 select committee mount an extraordinary investigation that not only unearthed damaging facts about Donald Trump, but had an impact in the midterms, convincing voters that the threats to democracy were significant. Now, Republicans say they intend to use that subpoena power to delve into some of the issues that have animated their base. What sorts of issues are they hoping to use that subpoena power to uncover? Do you have a sense of what their plans are for the next six months or so? It’s wide-ranging, everything you can imagine — from genuine policy issues related to illegal immigration and the border, Covid relief fraud and the Afghanistan withdrawal to more red meat issues for the base. I’m particularly interested in the newly established Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, which was a key demand of Speaker McCarthy’s hardline detractors. That one will look at ongoing criminal investigations, the FBI, the intelligence community, social media companies, etc. What does the news that classified documents linked to Biden from his time as vice president were found in an office of his do to that agenda? I’m certain the Oversight Committee will play a role in looking into those documents, and potentially this new subcommittee as well. It’s a legitimate issue worth exploring, and one that I have the sense is more common than people realize — the mishandling of classified documents. The Republicans were particularly animated because they used it as a chance to compare the situation to the criminal jeopardy that Trump is facing because of his own issue with classified documents. There’s just not enough information yet to really compare these cases, and at the very least, we know Biden’s team returned the documents without requiring a subpoena or drawn-out negotiations. Will Republicans demand a special counsel? Will that change how the DOJ conducts its business around this case? And how much of a thorn in Biden’s side does this have the potential to turn into? The main caveat is, we don’t know very many details about the Biden documents. Whatever Republicans say about it isn’t going to influence the Justice Department, but they will have to contend with the obvious questions about why Trump’s conduct warrants criminal scrutiny and Biden’s does not — if it does not. Politically, it presents an optics problem, but legally that theoretically shouldn’t matter. The biggest difference appears to be that when the Biden team discovered these documents, they turned them over immediately, it didn’t require a Justice Department subpoena and negotiations that dragged on for months. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Contact tonight’s author at cmchugh@politico.com or on Twitter at @calder_mchugh.
|